Jon Tester’s response to asking him to oppose UN-enforceable Background Check Expansion Act (S. 42).

I try to keep politics out of this sites blog unless it affects buying, selling and trading of guns. This traitorous “Act” in congress does that.

Read his response to me below after my messaging him asking him to oppose UBC’s. Then Contact Jon Tester to tell him how you feel about his position on the completely unenforceable without complete gun registration, Background Check Expansion Act (S. 42).

What do you think? Do you think UBC’s would help stop mass shootings? Take the poll, then share and comment below.


Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all firearms transactions?
  • I Oppose Universal Background Checks 100%, 23 votes
    23 votes 100%
    23 votes - 100% of all votes
  • I Support Universal Background Checks 0%, 0 votes
    0 votes
    0 votes - 0% of all votes
Total Votes: 23
Only registered users can vote. Login to vote.
Randy (Admin)

Developer and admin of Montana firearm sites.

Randy (Admin) avatar

Randy (Admin)

Developer and admin of Montana firearm sites.


AWR Hawkins explains how so-called “universal” background checks are just a step toward a gun registry and, ultimately, confiscation.
2 weeks ago
BigSkyDeadEye If you're a gun owner in modern day America, who cares about defending and protecting the 2nd Amendment, and is not politically active in the fight, then you are part of the problem and not the solution. It's time to get off the bench and get into the battle. Call or eMail your Representative and Senators today!
2 weeks ago
BigSkyDeadEye I received the same BS canned response from Tester's office regarding bill S.66 the Assault Weapons Ban of 2019. While he may have voted "against" this type of legislation in the past, he does not say he would fight against or vote NO on any future anti-gun bills. Tester is a fraud and a traitor. How the hell did he get re-elected in Montana?
2 weeks ago